Every long term professional relationship experiences the occasional bump, and the relationship between a small business and its accountant is no exception. A deadline slips, a piece of advice turns out to be based on outdated information, or communication simply goes quiet for longer than feels comfortable. The question most business owners struggle with is not whether something has gone wrong, but what to actually do about it, and at what point a minor frustration becomes something that genuinely needs to be escalated.
The first step, before escalating anything, is usually to raise the concern directly and simply with your existing point of contact. Many issues that feel serious in the moment turn out to be misunderstandings that a short, direct conversation resolves quickly. If a report seems wrong, ask about it plainly rather than assuming incompetence. If a deadline appears at risk, ask for a clear update rather than waiting anxiously. Giving your accountant the chance to explain, clarify, or correct the issue at this early stage respects the relationship and often resolves the concern without any further escalation being necessary at all.
There are, however, clear signs that a concern deserves to be escalated beyond a single informal conversation. Repeated missed deadlines, despite previous assurances that they would be met, suggest a pattern rather than an isolated slip. Advice that turns out to be factually incorrect, particularly if it leads to a financial cost such as a penalty or missed opportunity, deserves a more formal conversation about what happened and how it will be prevented in future. A consistent pattern of unanswered emails or unreturned calls, despite reasonable follow up on your part, is also a legitimate reason to escalate rather than continuing to quietly tolerate poor communication.
When escalating, it helps to be specific rather than general. Vague complaints about being unhappy with the service are much harder for a firm to act on than a specific account of what happened, when, and what impact it had. Rather than saying communication has been poor generally, it is more useful to say that three emails sent over the past month have gone unanswered, or that a promised call back three weeks ago never happened. Specificity gives the firm something concrete to respond to and demonstrates that your concern is grounded in a genuine pattern rather than a fleeting frustration.
Good firms build a clear escalation path into how they operate, and it is worth understanding this path before you actually need to use it. This typically means knowing who sits above your day to day contact, whether that is a senior manager or a partner, and how to reach them directly if a concern is not being resolved at the usual level. Firms such as Fred Michael & Co generally welcome this kind of direct escalation when needed, viewing it as a normal part of managing client relationships responsibly rather than as an unwelcome complaint to be deflected.
It is worth putting significant concerns in writing, even if the initial conversation happens by phone. A short follow up email summarising what was discussed, what was agreed, and by when, creates a useful record for both sides and reduces the chance of the same issue recurring due to a misunderstanding about what was actually promised. This is not about creating a paper trail out of distrust, but about ensuring clarity, which benefits both the client and the firm equally.
Timing matters when it comes to escalation. Concerns raised promptly, close to when the issue actually occurred, are generally easier to resolve than those raised months later after frustration has quietly built up. If something bothers you, it is almost always better to raise it within days or weeks rather than storing it up. Delayed escalation often arrives with more emotional weight attached, making a constructive conversation harder, and it also gives the firm less opportunity to actually fix the underlying process before it causes further problems.
It is also worth recognising when escalation, even done well, does not resolve the underlying issue, and a more fundamental decision about the relationship needs to be made. If concerns are consistently acknowledged but not actually addressed, or if the same problems recur repeatedly despite assurances, this may indicate a deeper mismatch between what you need and what the firm is able to provide. In these cases, escalation has served its purpose by giving the relationship a fair chance to improve, and it becomes reasonable to consider whether a different accountant might be a better fit for your business going forward.
It also helps to distinguish between a concern about a single mistake and a concern about a pattern of behaviour, since the appropriate response differs between the two. A single missed deadline, promptly acknowledged and corrected with a clear explanation, is a very different situation from a third missed deadline within a year despite repeated assurances. Treating an isolated incident with the same severity as an entrenched pattern can damage a relationship unnecessarily, while treating a genuine pattern as just another isolated incident allows a real problem to continue unaddressed. Being honest with yourself about which situation you are actually facing helps calibrate an appropriate and fair response.
When raising a concern, it is worth focusing the conversation on outcomes and solutions rather than solely on assigning blame. Asking what specifically will change to prevent a recurrence is generally more productive than simply expressing frustration about what already happened, even though that frustration may be entirely justified. A firm that responds to a raised concern with a concrete plan, such as assigning a specific person to double check upcoming deadlines or committing to a defined response time going forward, is demonstrating exactly the kind of accountability that a healthy escalation process should produce.
It is also reasonable to expect a firm to follow up after a concern has been raised, checking in later to confirm that the agreed changes have actually been implemented and are working as intended. This follow up step is often skipped, with concerns addressed in the moment but never revisited to confirm lasting improvement. Firms that build this kind of follow up into how they handle escalated concerns, rather than treating the initial conversation as the end of the matter, tend to demonstrate a genuine commitment to improvement rather than simply managing an uncomfortable conversation and moving on.
It is also worth acknowledging that escalation can feel uncomfortable, particularly for business owners who have built a genuinely friendly rapport with their day to day contact and worry that raising a concern might damage that relationship. In practice, the opposite is usually true. Professionals generally respect clients who raise concerns directly and constructively far more than those who quietly disengage or simply switch firms without ever explaining why. A firm worth staying with will treat a well handled escalation as valuable feedback rather than as an attack, and will generally emerge from the conversation with more respect for a client who cared enough to raise the issue properly.
Escalating a concern is not a sign of a failed relationship. Handled constructively, with specific detail and reasonable timing, it is often exactly what strengthens a working relationship over the long term, because it gives problems a chance to be identified and fixed before they become entrenched. Small business owners who feel comfortable raising concerns clearly and directly, and who understand the escalation path available to them, tend to end up with a stronger and more accountable relationship with their accountant than those who either avoid raising issues at all or who escalate every minor frustration immediately without giving a chance for a simple conversation to resolve it first.
Want Direct Access to Senior Financial Advice?
Let's build a relationship you can actually rely on
Fred Michael & Co Ltd offers direct, dedicated access to experienced financial support, including our virtual finance director service.